Dec 29, · In his book “The Whale and the Reactor” Langdon Winner asks the question “Do artifacts have politics?”. That question has provoked many to look for different dimensions of technology. Winner argues that technologies hold specific forms of power and authority and that they should be taken seriously as their own political blogger.comted Reading Time: 4 mins Oct 17, · DO ARTIFACTS HAVE POLITICS? [from Winner, L. (). The whale and the reactor: a search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, ] No idea is more provocative in controversies about technology and society than the notion that technical things have political qualities. At issue is the claim that the machines, structures, and systems of modern material culture can In his book "The Whale and the Reactor" Langdon Winner asks the question "Do artifacts have politics?". That question has provoked many to look for different dimensions of technology. Winner argues that technologies hold specific forms of power and authority and that they should be taken seriously as their own political phenomena
Do Artifacts Have Politics - Research Paper - Top
The objective of this paper is to discuss Langdon Winners theory on the politics of technology. That question has provoked many to look for different dimensions of technology.
Winner argues that technologies hold specific forms of power and authority and that they should be taken seriously as their own political phenomena. According to him technological innovations are similar to legislative acts or political foundings, which establish a framework for public order that will endure over many generations and for that reason careful attention should be paid to them Winner p.
Technological innovation should not be seen as an autonomous force whose outputs are derived simply from a technical logic. In other words, technologies are socially shaped by human actors, institutional choices and political power Sujatha Raman, We can not expect that social problems should find a technological solution and even new emerging technologies in the area of sustainable development, that are now perceived as the main problem solver should be look upon critically.
Technologies are not neutral instrument of social and economic progress but rather they have well defined political agendas. Winner gives simple examples to prove his case, but though simple those examples are symbolic of the basic idea that the very form taken by technologies must be taken seriously by political analysts. He concludes that not only artifacts have politics, but it's the most perverse of all since they hide their biases under the appearance of objectivity, efficiency or mere expediency Bruno Latour, Domus June He also argues that some kinds of technologies could not exist as an effective operating entity unless certain social as well as material conditions were met like for example nuclear power plant that requires a hierarchical system of political control in contrast with solar energy that can be deployed in a decentralized way in a democratic, egalitarian society.
Of course it is widely understood that technological artifacts are not neutral instruments to serve the advancement of humankind but they have their specific purposes weaved into their design, do artifacts have politics essay, which is not necessary of a political kind, do artifacts have politics essay, but they do represent a particular intended use.
But though technological artifacts may represent some political aim this does not mean do artifacts have politics essay that the aim is going to be achieved.
As a consequence from the thesis that technologies have underlying political and economic interests, a tendency has occurred in the academic efforts to show that these politics are harmful to the society. This leads to the fact that technology is being described as a negative force that needs to be controlled.
But on the other hand, technology does represent possibilities to improve and remedy social problems, like the ones we encounter in the environmental area. Technology is not just a negative force that needs to be checked; it is also a positive force to be made use of. Knut H. Different critiques to Winner have also emerged. In this view, the study of do artifacts have politics essay and politics that focuses only on political behavior.
Iva N. Ivanova ivai ifi, do artifacts have politics essay. no First semester at UiO Word count: Introduction The objective of this paper is to discuss Langdon Winners theory on the politics of technology. Read full document Save. Download as for upgraded members.
How to Write a Paper in a Weekend (By Prof. Pete Carr)
, time: 11:39
Oct 30, · Still a very relevant classic article: * Do Artifacts Have Politics? By Langdon Winner. Daedalus, Vol. , No. 1, Modern Technology: Problem or Opportunity? (Winter, ), pp. From a discussion by Dan Lockton: “Many academic fields touch on areas relevant to this subject, from architecture to computer science. Perhaps the closest single exposition of Continue reading →Estimated Reading Time: 2 mins Dec 02, · Langdon Winner, Do Artifacts Have Politics Essay Example. Pages: 24 ( words) Published: December 2, DO ARTIFACTS HAVE. POLITICS? [from Winner, L. (). The whale and the reactor: a search for limits in an age of high technology. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, ] No idea is more provocative in controversies about technical artifacts have political qualities: What matters is not technology itself, but the social or economic system in which it is embedded. This maxim, which in a number of variations is the central premise of a theory that can be called the social determination of technology, has an obvious wisdom. It Created Date: Z
No comments:
Post a Comment